Decline in value - prime cost vs diminishing value
One task across 30 published runs. Inspect the scores and outputs together, with each run's execution method shown.
- Task
- ACC-0006
- Domain
- Australian accounting
- Difficulty
- medium
Leading published run: claude-opus-4-8 (low reasoning) at 100.0% composite. Lowest: gemini-3.1-pro-preview at 80.0%. 30 published runs shown on this task.
How this task was evaluated
Results are ordered by this task's published score. API runs use one prompt and one completion; agent runs use a coding harness with tools and iteration. Inspect the execution method when comparing results.
Objective scores use the benchmark's execution checks. Judge scores use a vision panel's fixed rubric; the published score leaves out a model's own family. Missing values are labelled rather than treated as zero.
Read the brief
This is a benchmarking hypothetical, not tax advice. Figures are as at FY2025-26. A business buys a depreciating asset for $30,000. The asset has an effective life of 5 years and is used 100% for a taxable purpose. It is first used on the first day of the income year, so a full year applies (no part-year apportionment). Use these standard formulas for the first-year decline in value: - Prime cost method: cost * (1 / effective life) - Diminishing value method: cost * (2 / effective life) (The 2 in the diminishing value formula is the 200% rate that applies to assets first used on or after 10 May 2006.) State, in dollars, the first-year deduction for decline in value under: (a) the prime cost method, and (b) the diminishing value method. Name the controlling authority for the decline in value (capital allowance) rules.